Slack vs. Microsoft Teams: Overview
What is Slack?
Slack is described as “the operating system for work”, designed to centralize communication, collaboration, and automation in one place. It is widely used by startups, creative teams, and enterprises for its flexibility and powerful integrations.
Key features of Slack
- Centralized collaboration in channels (public or private).
- Over 2,600+ integrations with enterprise-ready apps (Google Drive, Office 365, Salesforce, etc.).
- Project management tools: Canvas, Lists, Templates, and File Sharing.
- Workflow Builder: No-code automation for routine tasks.
- Slack AI: Channel and thread summaries, daily recaps, meeting notes, translations.
- Enterprise Search powered by AI across Slack and integrated tools.
- Agentforce AI agents for data analysis, recommendations, and automation.
- Slack Connect: Secure collaboration with external partners.
- Analytics: Productivity metrics showing time saved and efficiency gains.
What is Microsoft Teams?
Microsoft Teams is officially described as “the hub for teamwork in Microsoft 365”, bringing together chat, meetings, calling, file sharing, and apps in one collaborative environment. It is favored by organizations already using Office 365.
Key features of Microsoft Teams
- Unified communication: chat, calls, and video meetings.
- Teams and channels structure: organize people, conversations, files, and tools around projects.
- Built-in apps: activity feed, chat, calendar, files, calls, plus Lists, Tasks, Praise, Approvals.
- Partner app integrations available in the Teams App Store.
- Advanced meeting tools: breakout rooms, custom backgrounds, in-meeting chat, PowerPoint Live, Microsoft Whiteboard, and AI-generated notes.
- Personal and free version: communication hub for personal or small-team use.
- Business/Enterprise plans: unlimited group meetings (up to 30 hours), 10 GB OneDrive storage per user, encrypted data, and optional Microsoft 365 Copilot.
- Deep integration with Microsoft 365 apps (Word, Excel, PowerPoint, SharePoint, OneDrive).
What are the main differences between Microsoft Teams and Slack?
The main differences lie in their ecosystems, target audiences, and pricing structures. Slack focuses on flexibility, ease of use, and broad integrations across various apps, while Microsoft Teams is deeply embedded in the Microsoft 365 suite, making it ideal for companies standardized on Microsoft tools. Teams generally offers more built-in enterprise features, whereas Slack relies more on integrations for advanced functionality.
Slack vs Teams: inviting users
Slack allows you to invite users via email or share an invitation link, with straightforward controls for guest access. Microsoft Teams also supports guest invitations, but it is more tightly tied to your organization’s Microsoft 365 account, which can make the process more complex for external collaborators.
Slack vs Teams: layout and design
Slack’s layout is minimalistic, with channels and direct messages in a simple left-hand menu, making navigation intuitive. Teams uses a tabbed structure with additional panels for meetings, files, and apps, which can feel busier but offers more in-app functionality without switching platforms.
Slack vs Teams: messaging
Both platforms offer direct messages, group chats, and channel-based discussions. Slack’s messaging feels faster and more lightweight, with better support for emojis, custom reactions, and workflow shortcuts. Teams messaging integrates more tightly with other Microsoft tools, making it easier to link or embed Office documents directly into conversations.
Slack vs Teams: threads
Threads in Slack are optional and appear alongside the main conversation, helping keep discussions organized without forcing them into a separate view. In Teams, threads are the default mode in channels, which keeps conversations more structured but can feel rigid for fast-paced discussions.
Slack vs Teams: file sharing and collaboration
Slack allows file uploads and integrates with tools like Google Drive, Dropbox, and OneDrive for document sharing. Microsoft Teams offers native file storage through SharePoint and OneDrive, with built-in real-time co-authoring in Office documents, making it particularly strong for collaborative editing.
Slack vs Teams: video calls
Slack supports voice and video calls directly, but its native calling features are basic, with limits on participant numbers unless you use integrations like Zoom. Microsoft Teams offers robust, built-in video conferencing with features such as meeting recording, screen sharing, and breakout rooms — more suited for large organizations.
Slack vs Teams: integrations
Slack boasts over 2,000 third-party integrations, covering everything from project management to customer support tools. Microsoft Teams supports fewer direct integrations but connects deeply with Microsoft 365 apps and services, making it powerful for businesses already in that ecosystem.
Slack vs Teams: help and support
Slack provides a searchable help center, 24/7 support for paid plans, and a large community forum. Microsoft Teams offers extensive documentation, Microsoft’s enterprise support channels, and a strong knowledge base — though navigating Microsoft’s support site can be challenging.
Slack vs Microsoft Teams: Features, pricing, and security
Slack’s pricing is per user per month, with free and paid tiers. It scales well for small to medium teams, though enterprise-level security features are mostly on higher plans. Microsoft Teams offers a free version and is included in most Microsoft 365 business subscriptions, making it cost-effective for organizations already paying for Microsoft services. Both platforms offer strong security, with Teams leveraging Microsoft’s enterprise-grade compliance features.
Category |
Slack |
Microsoft Teams |
---|---|---|
Ecosystem & Audience |
Flexible, broad third-party integrations; popular with startups and creative teams |
Embedded in Microsoft 365; ideal for companies standardized on Microsoft tools |
Inviting Users |
Easy via email or link; simple guest access |
Guest access tied to Microsoft 365 accounts; more complex for externals |
Layout & Design |
Minimal, intuitive channel-based interface |
Tabbed layout with chats, files, meetings, apps; more feature-rich but busier |
Messaging |
Lightweight, fast, with rich emojis and reactions |
Tight integration with Office apps; embeds documents easily |
Threads |
Optional, alongside main chat |
Default structure in channels; more rigid but organized |
File Sharing & Collaboration |
Uploads + integrations with Google Drive, Dropbox, OneDrive |
Native storage in SharePoint/OneDrive; real-time Office co-authoring |
Video Calls |
Basic native calls; integrations (Zoom, Webex) for advanced use |
Robust built-in meetings: recording, screen share, breakout rooms |
Integrations |
2,000+ third-party apps |
Fewer, but deep Microsoft 365 integrations |
Help & Support |
Help center, 24/7 support (paid), community forum |
Extensive documentation, enterprise support, knowledge base |
Scaling, Pricing & Security |
Per-user pricing; free & paid tiers; enterprise security on higher plans. |
Free version + bundled with Microsoft 365; enterprise-grade compliance. |
Slack vs Microsoft Teams vs TrueConf: Which is Better?
The right choice depends on your organization’s priorities:
- Slack suits teams seeking a clean, flexible, and integration-rich workspace.
- Microsoft Teams works best for organizations already embedded in the Microsoft 365 ecosystem, offering seamless communication, meetings, and file collaboration.
- TrueConf stands out if your top priorities include on-premises deployment, ultra-high-definition video conferencing, maximum security, and full control over infrastructure — particularly valuable for enterprises, regulated industries, or organizations needing reliable LAN/VPN-based communication.
Comparison Table: Slack vs. Microsoft Teams vs. TrueConf
Criteria |
Slack |
Microsoft Teams |
TrueConf |
---|---|---|---|
Deployment & Control |
Cloud-based only |
Cloud integration with MS 365 |
On-premises or LAN/VPN deployment, self-hosted for full infrastructure control |
Video Conferencing Quality & Scale |
Basic native video; relies on integrations for scale |
Robust built-in (with limits on free tiers) |
Ultra HD 4K video, up to 1,500 participants on screen, and virtual meetings up to 2,000 participants |
Security & Privacy |
Cloud-dependent; good baseline security |
Enterprise-grade via M365 |
Encrypted communications, LAN-only operation, DLP, MFA, 2FA, and full data sovereignty |
Messaging & Collaboration Tools |
Channels, direct messages, integrations |
Teams, channels, Office integration |
Built-in team messenger, file sharing, personal/group chats, surveys, content sharing |
Integration Capabilities |
Extensive third-party app support |
Deep Microsoft 365 integration |
Integrates with Active Directory, DLP systems, LDAP, SIP/H.323 endpoints, and corporate calendars |
Enterprise Features |
Limited; relies on add-on integrations |
Rich if tied to M365 |
Simultaneous translation, waiting rooms, record control, conference PIN changes, federation, load balancing, clusterization, SSO, statistics dashboards, developer API/SDK |
Ideal For |
Agile, integration-driven teams. |
MS 365–centric organizations. |
Organizations requiring maximum security, on-prem deployment, ultra HD conferencing, and enterprise control. |
Why TrueConf Might Be the Superior Choice for Certain Organizations
1. Full Control & Privacy
Unlike Slack or Teams, TrueConf can be deployed entirely within your corporate network—no reliance on the internet—which ensures absolute control over data and operations.
2. High-Quality, Large-Scale Video Conferencing
Supports Ultra HD (4K) video quality, with up to 1,500 participants visible, and virtual meetings of up to 2,000 attendees — superior to typical conferencing limits in Slack or Teams.
3. Enterprise-Grade Security
Offers encrypted communication, DLP features, multi-factor authentication, and operates independently of external services for enhanced security compliance.
4. Rich Feature Set Tailored for Large Organizations
Includes advanced capabilities like simultaneous interpretation, dynamic access controls (like PIN change, banning participants), conference recording control, waiting rooms, federation with other TrueConf servers, scalability, clusterization, and real-time analytics.
5. Seamless Integration with Enterprise Infrastructure
Fully compatible with Active Directory, SIP/H.323 endpoints, LDAP directories, and supports a corporate address book, making it a natural fit for complex IT environments.
Take your team communication to the next level with TrueConf!
A powerful self-hosted video conferencing solution for up to 1,000 users, available on desktop, mobile, and room systems.
Conclusion
Both Slack and Microsoft Teams provide powerful collaboration tools, but the right choice depends on your team’s ecosystem and workflow needs. TrueConf, however, offers unmatched security, on-premises deployment, and ultra-HD video conferencing, making it the best option for organizations that require maximum control and reliability.
Follow us on social networks