Top 10 Self-Hosted Chat Software Solutions in 2026
Updated May 2026
Executive Summary
Organizations that need full control over their communication data increasingly choose self-hosted chat platforms over cloud-based SaaS tools. This guide covers the 10 strongest self-hosted chat solutions available — evaluated on security, deployment flexibility, video conferencing capability, compliance, and scalability.
Key takeaway: TrueConf Server is the most complete self-hosted solution for enterprises that need integrated video conferencing alongside team messaging, offline LAN operation, and strict data compliance. For open-source-first teams, Rocket.Chat and Mattermost offer the most mature ecosystems. For maximum message-level security, Element (Matrix) and Wire are the strongest options.
Why trust us?
Every app we cover is selected, tested, and reviewed by human experts who follow strict editorial and evaluation guidelines. We focus on solutions that are practical, purpose-built, and capable of delivering real value for the specific use case or business context we’re analyzing — while also offering pricing that is fair and justifiable. Our methodology is transparent, straightforward, and available to everyone:
Quick Comparison: All 10 Self-Hosted Chat Platforms
|
PLATFORM |
OPEN SOURCE |
VIDEO CONFERENCING |
OFFLINE/LAN |
GDPR COMPLIANT |
SSO/NTLM |
BEST FOR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
TrueConf |
No |
Yes (built-in, 4K) |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Enterprise, regulated industries |
|
Rocket.Chat |
Yes |
Yes (built-in) |
No (integrations only) |
Yes |
Yes |
Dev teams, open-source communities |
|
Mattermost |
Yes |
No (via integration) |
No |
Yes |
Yes |
DevOps, compliance-heavy teams |
|
Zulip |
Yes |
Yes |
No |
No |
Yes |
Technical teams, async workflows |
|
Element (Matrix) |
Yes |
Yes |
No |
No |
Yes |
Privacy advocates, federated orgs |
|
Nextcloud Talk |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
No |
Yes |
File-sharing + chat combined |
|
Wire |
Yes |
Yes |
No |
No |
No |
Government, defense, G7 |
|
Troop Messenger |
No |
No |
No |
No |
Yes |
Office teams, SMBs |
|
Wickr |
Partial |
No |
No |
No |
Yes |
Defense, high-security enterprise |
|
Jitsi |
Yes |
Yes |
No |
No |
No |
Lightweight video, education |
What Is a Self-Hosted Chat Platform?
A self-hosted chat platform is a communication system in which the server component is hosted on the user’s own infrastructure, rather than on the servers of a third-party service provider. This means the organization has full control over the server, data storage, and access policies.
Such platforms are commonly used for business communications where a high level of control, security, and regulatory compliance is required. When using a self-hosted solution, all data remains within the organization’s own network — which directly enhances confidentiality and reduces exposure to third-party data breaches.
Users can customize the platform according to their specific needs, including integration with existing internal systems and corporate branding. However, managing a self-hosted chat server requires technical skills: administrators are responsible for server maintenance, software updates, backup management, and resolving any technical issues.
In today’s data-driven environment, the value of data sovereignty cannot be overstated. For large enterprises, government entities, and organizations in regulated industries, effective risk management around communications infrastructure is not optional — it is a compliance requirement. Self-hosted chat platforms address this need directly.
💡 Insight #1 — SaaS vs. Self-Hosted: The Control Tradeoff Most Buyers Underestimate: SaaS chat tools like Slack or Microsoft Teams are fast to deploy but place all data, retention policies, and platform updates under vendor control. A self-hosted platform inverts this entirely — your IT team controls the update schedule, data retention rules, user access, and encryption keys. For organizations subject to GDPR, HIPAA, or national data residency laws, this distinction is not a preference; it is often a legal obligation. The operational overhead of self-hosting is real, but so is the compliance risk of not doing it.
How to Choose a Self-Hosted Chat Platform: Key Criteria
Before evaluating individual platforms, it helps to define what matters most for your use case. The following criteria are the most commonly decisive factors:
- Deployment model — Does the platform support true air-gapped or LAN-only operation, or does it require internet access even when self-hosted?
- Video conferencing — Is video built natively into the platform, or does it require a third-party integration?
- Open-source vs. proprietary — Does your organization require source code transparency for security auditing?
- Compliance requirements — Does the platform support GDPR, HIPAA, ISO 27001, or specific national standards?
- Scalability — Can the platform scale from 50 users to 5,000+ without architectural changes?
- Authentication and SSO — Does it support LDAP, Active Directory, SAML, or NTLM for enterprise identity management?
- Total cost of ownership — What are the licensing, infrastructure, and IT management costs over 3 years?
Self-Hosted Team Messenger with Video Conferencing
A cutting-edge team collaboration server with personal and group chats, UltraHD video conferences, and advanced AI-powered features — free for up to 1,000 users!
Best Self-Hosted Chat Software Solutions
TrueConf

TrueConf Server offers an on-premises corporate messenger that enhances communication reliability and streamlines remote collaboration workflows. It places strong emphasis on security through encryption, ISO 27001 compliance, and GDPR compliance. It allows offline operation in LAN/VPN environments and provides total control over your communication infrastructure.
TrueConf Server is the only platform in this guide that combines enterprise-grade video conferencing (up to 4K with SVC architecture), a full team messenger, and complete offline LAN operation in a single self-hosted package — with a free license covering up to 1,000 users.
Key features of TrueConf Server:
- Self-hosted deployment with complete data sovereignty and no dependency on vendor cloud infrastructure
- Built-in video conferencing supporting up to 2,000 participants with Ultra HD 4K quality and Scalable Video Coding (SVC)
- Full team messenger with personal chats, group chats, file sharing, and message history
- Offline operation in LAN/VPN environments — functions without any internet connection
- Encryption for all media streams and stored data
- Compliance with ISO 27001 and GDPR
- Native SIP/H.323 support for interoperability with existing VoIP and room systems
- Client applications for Windows, macOS, Linux, iOS, Android, and web browser
- Single sign-on (SSO), NTLM, and Active Directory integration
- Free license for up to 1,000 users — no per-user fees
TrueConf Server is suitable for businesses with stringent data protection regulations, government organizations, defense contractors, and any enterprise requiring deep customization, integration with internal systems, and fully offline-capable communication.
Best for: Regulated industries, government, healthcare, manufacturing, and enterprise environments where internet-independent operation is required.
Strengths: Most complete feature set among self-hosted options; only platform combining 4K video + offline LAN + 1,000-user free license.
Limitations: Not open-source; requires internal IT for deployment and maintenance.
Try TrueConf Server Free!
- 1,000 online users with the ability to chat and make one-on-one video calls.
- 10 PRO users with the ability to participate in group video conferences.
- One SIP/H.323/RTSP connection for interoperability with corporate PBX and SIP/H.323 endpoints.
- One guest connection to invite a non-authenticated user via link to your meetings.

Rocket.Chat

Rocket.Chat is an open-source platform available at no licensing cost. It is widely preferred by open-source communities and development-focused organizations as their primary communication platform. Its active development community delivers new features and improvements on a regular release cycle.
Rocket.Chat organizes communication into public channels (accessible to any participant) or private channels (by invitation only). The platform supports direct messaging between individual users, as well as sharing of documents, links, photographs, videos, and GIFs.
Rocket.Chat can be installed on any server of your choice — whether a dedicated physical server or a cloud-hosted virtual private server — giving you full control over deployment architecture and performance tuning.
Key features of Rocket.Chat:
- Public and private channels for organized team communication
- Direct messaging for one-on-one conversations
- Sharing of diverse media types: documents, links, photos, videos, and GIFs
- Built-in video calls and voice messages
- Open-source with full source code available on GitHub
- Real-time message translation for international teams
- Integration with GitHub, GitLab, Trello, and other developer tools
- Mobile applications for iOS and Android
- End-to-end encryption for private channels and direct messages
- LDAP, SAML, and OAuth authentication support
Best for: Development teams, open-source organizations, and companies that need a self-hosted Slack alternative with full code transparency.
Strengths: Mature open-source ecosystem; strong integration library; real-time translation.
Limitations: Video conferencing requires third-party integration (e.g., Jitsi); no native offline/LAN mode.
💡 Insight #2 — When “Open Source” Doesn’t Mean “Free to Run”: Several platforms in this guide are technically free and open-source, but the actual total cost of ownership includes server infrastructure, IT administration time, update management, and potential enterprise support subscriptions. Rocket.Chat and Mattermost, for example, charge for enterprise features like compliance exports, advanced authentication, and dedicated support. TrueConf takes a different approach — proprietary software with a generous free license (up to 1,000 users) and predictable server-based pricing with no per-user fees. Depending on team size and IT capacity, either model can be more cost-effective. The key is to calculate TCO over 3 years, not just the upfront licensing cost.
Mattermost

Mattermost is an open-source, self-hostable team messaging platform built for secure collaboration throughout all stages of a project. It is built on Go and React — well-established and auditable programming languages — and is designed to run on Linux systems with either MySQL or PostgreSQL databases.
Mattermost is particularly valued by organizations with specific compliance requirements, as it provides full data sovereignty, detailed audit logging, and granular administrative controls. The platform sends security bulletins to administrators, ensuring that critical updates are communicated proactively.
Key features of Mattermost:
- Open-source platform designed for secure team collaboration
- Built with Go and React; runs on Linux with MySQL or PostgreSQL
- Public channels, private channels, and direct messaging
- File sharing with search and version history
- Integration with developer tools including Jira, GitHub, GitLab, and CI/CD pipelines
- Multi-factor authentication and end-to-end encryption
- Proactive security bulletin notifications for administrators
- Compliance exports and audit logs (Enterprise tier)
- LDAP, SAML, and Active Directory integration
- Monthly community releases plus enterprise support options
Best for: DevOps teams, software development organizations, and compliance-heavy enterprises that require a fully auditable, self-hosted messaging infrastructure.
Strengths: Strong developer tool integrations; detailed compliance controls; active open-source community.
Limitations: No native video conferencing — requires integration with Zoom, Jitsi, or similar; no offline LAN mode.
Zulip

Zulip is a widely used group chat platform distinguished by its topic-based threading structure, which organizes conversations within channels by subject. This model differs fundamentally from the flat channel approach used by Slack and most other platforms, making it particularly effective for asynchronous workflows and technical teams managing multiple concurrent discussions.
Like other platforms, Zulip supports emojis, inline images, and video embeds. It also supports LaTeX rendering for mathematical formulas and syntax highlighting for code sharing — making it a strong choice for engineering and academic environments.
Zulip is open-source with its full source code available on GitHub. It offers premium services including on-premises support, LDAP integration, and expanded storage.
Key features of Zulip:
- Topic-based threading model for organized, asynchronous conversations
- Support for emojis, inline images, videos, and link previews
- LaTeX rendering for sharing mathematical formulas and equations
- Syntax highlighting for code sharing
- Cross-platform availability with APIs for custom integrations
- GitHub integration allowing direct referencing of pull request IDs
- Paid offerings for on-premises support, LDAP integration, and additional storage
- Full source code available on GitHub
- Mobile apps for iOS and Android
Best for: Technical teams, engineering organizations, academic institutions, and any team that relies heavily on asynchronous communication.
Strengths: Unique topic threading model reduces notification overload; excellent for async-first teams.
Limitations: No native offline operation; GDPR compliance requires additional configuration; smaller ecosystem than Rocket.Chat or Mattermost.
Element (Matrix)

Element is a decentralized, open-source messaging platform built on the Matrix protocol. It focuses on protecting the most sensitive components of an organization’s communications — including executive-level exchanges, intellectual property discussions, and cybersecurity operations.
The platform is fully operator-controlled. All forms of communication — voice, video, messaging, and file collaboration — are protected with end-to-end encryption by default. Element’s federated architecture means organizations can run their own homeserver while still communicating with users on other Matrix servers, or operate in a fully isolated private network.
Key features of Element (Matrix):
- End-to-end encryption enabled by default for all communication types
- User-controlled, operator-managed communication infrastructure
- Decentralized and federated architecture — interoperable across Matrix servers
- Designed to scale for large organizations with thousands of users
- Supports thousands of users within a single encrypted chat room
- Integration bridges to Slack, Discord, IRC, Telegram, and other platforms
- Third-party integrations with Jira, GitHub, and Google Drive
- Available via web browser, desktop apps, and mobile apps (iOS and Android)
- Active open-source community with continuous development
Best for: Privacy advocates, government agencies, organizations requiring cross-platform federation, and security-focused enterprises.
Strengths: Strongest privacy and decentralization model; bridges to other platforms; fully auditable open-source codebase.
Limitations: Interface can feel complex for non-technical users; self-hosting requires server management expertise; GDPR compliance requires configuration.
Nextcloud Talk

Nextcloud is a unified collaboration platform that combines file storage, team messaging, video conferencing, and office document editing in a single self-hosted solution. Its primary goal is to consolidate communication and productivity tools under one infrastructure, eliminating the need to run separate systems for files, chat, and meetings.
Nextcloud is open-source and benefits from a large contributor community. It also offers enterprise support for organizations that need professional assistance alongside the self-hosted deployment.
Key features of Nextcloud:
- Four integrated components: Files, Talk (chat/video), Groupware (calendar/contacts), and Office (document editing)
- Desktop, mobile, and web interfaces for broad device coverage
- Offline access capability for core productivity tools
- Video conferencing built into the Talk component
- Data compliance tools for managing regulatory obligations
- Full metadata control and storage security
- LDAP, SAML, and SSO authentication support
- Enterprise support available despite open-source foundation
- Unrestricted access to data across multiple connected storage systems
Best for: Organizations that want a single self-hosted platform combining file management, messaging, video, and document collaboration.
Strengths: Most comprehensive all-in-one self-hosted workspace; strong file management; supports offline access.
Limitations: GDPR compliance requires additional configuration; performance can degrade with large user bases on underpowered servers.
💡 Insight #3 — The Video Conferencing Gap in Self-Hosted Chat Tools: Most self-hosted chat platforms — including Mattermost, Rocket.Chat, and Zulip — do not include native video conferencing. They rely on third-party integrations (typically Jitsi) for video calls, which introduces additional infrastructure dependencies, maintenance overhead, and potential points of failure. TrueConf Server and Nextcloud Talk are the primary exceptions: both include video conferencing as a built-in native capability. For organizations that treat video meetings as a core workflow — not an occasional add-on — this distinction significantly changes the deployment complexity and long-term cost model.
Wire

Wire is a secure communication platform designed for environments with the highest security requirements. It provides end-to-end encryption for messaging, conferencing, and file sharing, with options for both cloud and on-premises deployment.
Wire is used by government bodies, defense sector organizations, and critical infrastructure providers. It is notably used to secure confidential communications for executive branches of G7 countries. The platform advances encryption standards through its implementation of Messaging Layer Security (MLS).
Key features of Wire:
- End-to-end encrypted messaging, conferencing, and file sharing
- Available for cloud or on-premises deployment
- Used by government bodies, defense organizations, and critical infrastructure providers
- Secures executive-level communications for G7 country governments
- Dedicated applications for Windows, macOS, iOS, and Android
- Supports Messaging Layer Security (MLS) for advanced encryption standards
- Open-source codebase for security auditing
Best for: Government agencies, defense organizations, and enterprises operating in high-security, high-stakes communication environments.
Strengths: Proven in government and defense deployments; strong encryption standards including MLS.
Limitations: No SSO/NTLM support; limited scalability for large commercial deployments; GDPR compliance requires configuration.
Troop Messenger

Troop Messenger is a team communication platform designed for office environments, offering a range of features for both individual and group collaboration. The application supports one-on-one messaging, group discussions, bulk messaging, and audio-video calls — individually or in groups.
Key features of Troop Messenger:
- Real-time, secure instant messaging for individuals and groups
- File, document, and media sharing within chat conversations
- Integration with third-party applications including Google Drive, Dropbox, and Trello
- End-to-end encryption for all communications
- Audio and video calls for individuals and groups
- On-premises deployment option for data control
Best for: Office teams and SMBs that need a straightforward self-hosted messaging tool without the complexity of an enterprise platform.
Strengths: Simple, focused feature set; easy to adopt for non-technical teams.
Limitations: Not open-source; no native video conferencing beyond basic calls; no offline LAN support; limited scalability for large organizations.
Wickr

Wickr is a secure messaging platform developed with a strong focus on ephemeral communications and high-security environments. It provides end-to-end encrypted messages that automatically expire after a configured period. These messages can include photos, videos, and file attachments.
Wickr is compatible with iOS, Android, macOS, Windows, and Linux. Its product line includes Wickr Me (consumer), Wickr Pro (business), Wickr RAM (defense forces), and Wickr Enterprise (large organizations). Wickr RAM is specifically designed for defense and military applications, maintaining security even in extreme operational conditions. Wickr Enterprise is built for organizations with large workforces requiring smooth integration into existing IT workflows.
Key features of Wickr:
- End-to-end encrypted instant messaging across all supported platforms
- Configurable message expiration for automatic deletion after a set period
- Media sharing for photos, videos, and file attachments
- Platform compatibility: iOS, Android, macOS, Windows, Linux
- Product variants: Wickr Me, Wickr Pro, Wickr RAM, Wickr Enterprise
- Wickr RAM designed for exceptional security in extreme operational environments
- Enterprise integration designed to incorporate into existing IT workflows
- SSO and compliance controls available in enterprise tier
Best for: Defense organizations, intelligence agencies, and enterprises with strict requirements for message-level security and ephemeral communications.
Strengths: Strongest ephemeral messaging capabilities; proven in defense deployments; cross-platform.
Limitations: Video conferencing not included; limited GDPR compliance tooling; open-source limited to the crypto library only.
Jitsi

Jitsi Meet is a fully encrypted, 100% open-source platform for video calls. It is designed for everyday use without requiring user accounts, and its hosted version is free to use. Jitsi’s adoption in education settings — including Italian schools deploying WeSchool based on 8×8’s Jitsi infrastructure — demonstrates its reliability for broad, accessible deployment.
Key features of Jitsi Meet:
- High-quality video conferences supporting multiple participants (up to 100 on standard deployments)
- In-meeting chat for text messages, links, and file sharing during calls
- Screen sharing for presentations and collaboration
- Customizable interface with organizational branding options
- Scalable architecture suitable for organizations of all sizes when self-hosted
- No account required for participants — join via browser link
- Open-source with full self-hosting capability
- Mobile apps for iOS and Android
Best for: Educational institutions, small teams, and organizations needing a lightweight, account-free video conferencing tool with self-hosting capability.
Strengths: Zero friction for participants (no account required); fully open-source; easy to embed or customize.
Limitations: No built-in persistent team chat; no document sharing; no SSO/NTLM; GDPR compliance requires configuration; performance degrades with large participant counts on underpowered servers.
Full Feature Comparison Table
|
PLATFORM |
SSO / NTLM |
VIDEO CONFERENCING |
OFFLINE / LAN |
OPEN SOURCE |
ENCRYPTION |
DOCUMENT SHARING |
GDPR COMPLIANT |
SCALABILITY |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Rocket.Chat |
Yes |
Yes |
No (integrations only) |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
|
Mattermost |
Yes |
No (integrations only) |
No |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
|
Zulip |
Yes |
Yes |
No |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
No |
Yes |
|
Element (Matrix) |
Yes |
Yes |
No |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
No |
Yes |
|
Nextcloud |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
No |
Yes |
|
Wire |
No |
Yes |
No |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
No |
No |
|
Troop Messenger |
Yes |
No |
No |
No |
Yes |
Yes |
No |
No |
|
Wickr |
Yes |
No |
No |
Partial |
Yes |
Yes |
No |
No |
|
Jitsi |
No |
Yes |
No |
Yes |
Yes |
No |
No |
Yes |
|
TrueConf |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
No |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Pricing Model Comparison
|
PLATFORM |
FREE TIER |
PAID MODEL |
PER-USER FEES |
ENTERPRISE OPTION |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
TrueConf |
Free up to 1,000 users |
Per server license |
No |
Yes |
|
Rocket.Chat |
Free (open-source) |
Per user/month (Enterprise) |
Yes |
Yes |
|
Mattermost |
Free (open-source) |
Per user/month (Enterprise) |
Yes |
Yes |
|
Zulip |
Free (open-source) |
Per user/month (cloud) |
Yes |
Yes |
|
Element (Matrix) |
Free (self-hosted) |
Per user/month (Element Matrix Services) |
Yes |
Yes |
|
Nextcloud |
Free (open-source) |
Per user/year (Enterprise) |
Yes |
Yes |
|
Wire |
No free self-hosted tier |
Per user/month |
Yes |
Yes |
|
Troop Messenger |
Limited trial |
Per user/month |
Yes |
Yes |
|
Wickr |
Free (Wickr Me) |
Per user/month (Enterprise) |
Yes |
Yes |
|
Jitsi |
Free (open-source) |
Per user/month (8×8 hosted) |
Yes |
Yes |
Conclusion: Choosing the Right Self-Hosted Chat Platform
The right self-hosted chat platform depends on a combination of your technical environment, compliance obligations, team size, and whether video conferencing is a core requirement or an occasional need.
Decision framework:
- If you need offline/LAN operation with built-in video conferencing → TrueConf Server is the only platform that covers both natively
- If you need open-source transparency with a mature integration ecosystem → Rocket.Chat or Mattermost
- If your team is async-first and technically sophisticated → Zulip
- If maximum message-level privacy and federation matter most → Element (Matrix) or Wire
- If you want a single platform for files, chat, and video → Nextcloud
- If you operate in defense or government with extreme security needs → Wire or Wickr
- If you need lightweight video-first collaboration with no accounts required → Jitsi
TrueConf Server’s combination of a 1,000-user free license, built-in 4K video conferencing, offline LAN support, and enterprise compliance (ISO 27001, GDPR) makes it the most complete option for organizations that cannot compromise on either communication quality or data control.
FAQ
What is the best self-hosted chat platform for enterprises with strict data compliance requirements?
TrueConf Server is the strongest option for compliance-heavy enterprises. It supports on-premises deployment with full offline LAN operation, ISO 27001 and GDPR compliance, and encrypted media streams — all without any data leaving the organization’s own infrastructure. Unlike cloud-based tools, TrueConf gives administrators complete control over data retention, user access, and update schedules.
Which self-hosted chat platforms include built-in video conferencing?
TrueConf, Rocket.Chat, Zulip, Element, Nextcloud Talk, Wire, and Jitsi all include video conferencing capabilities. However, only TrueConf and Nextcloud Talk offer video as a fully native, built-in feature. Rocket.Chat and Mattermost typically integrate with Jitsi for video, which introduces additional infrastructure dependencies.
Can self-hosted chat platforms work without internet access?
Yes, but only a few support true offline or LAN-only operation. TrueConf Server is the most capable platform for air-gapped or internet-restricted environments — it is designed to run entirely within a corporate LAN or VPN with no external connectivity required. Nextcloud also supports offline access for core features. Most other platforms in this guide require internet connectivity even when self-hosted.
What is the difference between open-source and proprietary self-hosted chat platforms?
Open-source platforms like Rocket.Chat, Mattermost, and Element allow full code inspection, community contributions, and custom modifications — which is valuable for security audits and regulatory compliance. Proprietary platforms like TrueConf offer a more controlled, tested, and supported product experience with guaranteed compatibility and dedicated vendor support. For organizations without in-house development capacity, a proprietary platform like TrueConf often delivers lower operational overhead despite the closed-source model.
How many users can TrueConf Server support on the free license?
TrueConf Server’s free license supports up to 1,000 users — significantly more than the free tiers of most competing platforms. This makes it one of the most cost-effective entry points for enterprise-scale self-hosted communication, particularly compared to Rocket.Chat or Mattermost enterprise tiers which charge per user per month once you exceed basic community edition limits.
Which self-hosted chat platform is best for defense and government use?
Wire and Wickr are the most widely deployed platforms in government and defense contexts. Wire is used to secure communications for executive branches in G7 countries. Wickr RAM is specifically engineered for military field operations in extreme conditions. For organizations that also need video conferencing alongside high-security messaging, TrueConf Server is used in government and regulated enterprise environments due to its offline operation capability and compliance certifications.
Is Jitsi a complete replacement for a self-hosted team chat platform?
Jitsi Meet is an excellent self-hosted video conferencing tool, but it is not a complete team chat platform. It lacks persistent messaging, document sharing, user management at enterprise scale, and SSO integration. For organizations that need both persistent messaging and video conferencing in a single self-hosted system, TrueConf Server or Rocket.Chat (with Jitsi integration) are more complete solutions.
About the Author
Nikita Dymenko is a technology writer and business development professional with more than six years of experience in the unified communications industry. Drawing on his background in product management, strategic growth, and business development at TrueConf, Nikita creates insightful articles and reviews about video conferencing platforms, collaboration tools, and enterprise messaging solutions.








Follow us on social networks